Özgün Law Firm

Özgün Law Firm

HUMANA AGREES TO SETTLE THE CASE BY PAYING $90 MILLION TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN THE CASE “UNITED STATES EX REL. SCOTT V. HUMANA INC.”

HUMANA AGREES TO SETTLE THE CASE BY PAYING $90 MILLION TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN THE CASE “UNITED STATES EX REL. SCOTT V. HUMANA INC.”

"United States ex rel. Scott v. Humana Inc." is a legal case that involves allegations of fraud against Humana Inc., a health insurance company.

 

Case Background:

 

Plaintiff: The case was brought by a whistleblower (also known as a "relator"), named Scott, under the False Claims Act (FCA), which allows private individuals to sue on behalf of the government if they believe a company is defrauding federal programs.

 

Defendant: Humana Inc., a major health insurance provider.

 

Allegations:

 

The whistleblower, Scott, alleged that Humana was involved in fraudulent activities related to its administration of Medicare Advantage programs.

 

The Medicare Advantage program, through which private insurers like Humana provide Medicare benefits, pays insurers more for patients who are diagnosed with more severe health conditions. The lawsuit claimed that Humana systematically submitted exaggerated or false diagnosis codes to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). By doing this, Humana allegedly received higher payments than it was entitled to, thereby defrauding the government.

 

Specifically, the accusations centered around upcoding and misrepresenting patient diagnoses to receive higher payments from Medicare, a federal program that provides health insurance to individuals aged 65 and older.

 

Upcoding involves submitting claims to Medicare that reflect more severe conditions than the patient has, which leads to higher reimbursement rates.

 

Scott’s suit was filed in 2016 in the US District Court for the Central District of California under the case number 16-cv-401 and continued until August 2024.

 

Settlement: Humana agreed to settle the case by paying $90 million to the federal government.

 

Humana said, "While we are confident in our position and expected to prevail at trial, we have decided to enter into a settlement agreement without admitting any wrongdoing to avoid the uncertainty, distraction, inconvenience, and expense of a lengthy jury trial," in a statement.

 

Sources:

Case United States ex rel. Scott v. Humana Inc. (16-cv-401)

 

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/humana-pay-90-mln-settle-claim-that-it-overcharged-medicare-drugs-2024-08-16/

 

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/federal-contracting/humana-will-pay-90-million-in-medicare-drug-fraud-settlement

 

https://www.phillipsandcohen.com/humana-settles-for-90-million/

SHARE NEWS
PRINT NEWS